"We look at everything that connects into storage, so we'll cover things from battery backups and racks, all the way out to thin clients. Despite its name, covers the entire spectrum of the storage market, including computing system performance. Kevin has spent more than a decade in editorial positions in the tech industry and is currently lab director at. And the fact that they are maintained and published by a non-partisan consortium is critical to credibility." "Benchmarks aren’t perfect, but SPEC/GWPG does a good job of making them well-rounded. I use SPECviewperf as my standard for benchmarking workstation GPUs, as it primarily stresses the graphics subsystem. SPECwpc is especially nice if the review is for a system that is targeted at a specific vertical, as it provides composites for six different application categories. I use the former as my baseline benchmark when reviewing systems. "The two I rely on the most are SPECwpc and SPECviewperf. For example, if you only view models in ‘shaded and edges’ mode, just check out that specific score."Ī 25+ year veteran of the computer graphics industry, Alex authors Jon Peddie Research’s Workstation Report and does reviews for the TechWatch newsletter. The overall graphics composite scores are useful, but you can get a much better understanding of how performance relates to your specific workflows by looking at individual scores for different render modes. "One of the best things about the SPECapc benchmarks is they allow you to drill down into the details of 3D graphics benchmarking. Importantly, the results are consistent (so the benchmarks are reliable) and the benchmarks run inside actual CAD applications so they better reflect what the CAD user would experience in the real world. "At Develop3D magazine, we find the SPECapc benchmarks (both SolidWorks and PTC Creo) very useful because they provide a detailed view of graphics performance. As part of my review, I need to include objective performance metrics using tests that are readily available so that the same test could be run by someone else in order to validate the results I obtain."Īs managing editor of Develop3D, Greg has used SPEC/GWPG benchmarks in reviews of hundreds of CAD/CAM workstations and graphics cards. "I feel that SPEC/GWPG benchmarks add a greater level of detail and credibility to my reviews. "I use SPECviewperf to test graphics performance of workstations and GPUs, SPECapc for SolidWorks to test overall performance of workstations running typical MCAD applications, and SPECwpc to test overall performance of workstations. Here's what they had to say:ĭavid is one of the longest-time users of SPEC/GWPG benchmarks, dating back to when Digital Engineering (formerly Desktop Engineering ) was a print-only publication. We talked to some reviewers who are long-time users of SPEC/GWPG benchmarks to find out which benchmarks they use and why they use them. If there is a review of a professional workstation or graphics card within an online or print publication, the reviewer is likely to quote results from a SPEC Graphics and Workstation Performance Group ( SPEC/GWPG) benchmark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |